This is a constant source of irritation, as the default settings are carefully chosen so as to make it difficult for students to do a good job of data presentation.His darts were released later.Murderous spirits are all real martial arts.It s your master Pei s martial arts that is so bad that you can t resist it at all.Who.Quit all Microsoft Office for Mac applications. I gripe about Excel a lot, as we're more or less forced to use it for data analysis in the intro labs (students who have taken the intro engineering course supposedly are taught how to work with Excel, and it's kind of difficult to buy a computer without it these days, so it eliminates the "I couldn't do anything with the data" excuse for not doing lab reports). Yesterday's bad graphic post spurred me to finally get around to doing the "Why Does Excel Suck So Much?" post I've been meaning to do for a while. To make disk space available, you can move files to another disk or an external storage device, then delete files you no longer need on the startup disk. Your computer’s startup disk may not have enough free disk space. If you find your Mac is running slowly, there are a number of potential causes that you can check.
![]() Why Is Office So Bad How To Work WithMaybe there's some way to convert that R 2 value into an uncertainty, but I don't know what it is, and you can be sure that our students have absolutely no idea. Which is fine, if you're doing biology or something, but in physics, we care about the numerical values of things, and the uncertainties in those numerical values.Having the slope of the line is nice, and all, but if you're going to do anything with it, you need the uncertainty in the slope. It's actually quite simple to superficially do the right thing, by right-clicking a point and adding a "Trendline." You can even get it to display some information (I've trimmed the graph down to a single series, for clarity):Of course, what's shown on that graph is the sum total of the information you can get about the trendline: an equation, and an R 2 value. Usually, we really care about the slope of the line, or something like that, so let's look at how Excel does there. Changing the data points to colors that don't resemble one of those eye tests they give you in grade school requires you to change both the "foreground" and "background" colors of each series, and "foreground" and "background" are not defined the way you might think.After a good deal of pointing and clicking, you can end up with something halfway presentable:Of course, when you realize that you're going to need to do all this every time you make a graph, the several hundred dollar price tag for a real scientific graphing package doesn't seem so bad.Of course, it's rare to have a lab in which you just plot points with no further analysis. Bluestacks offline installer old version for macThe color schemes and axis settings lead to illegible plots no matter what sort of data you're working with. It's not really for scientists, though." Which is true, but here's the thing: the things I've complained about here aren't good for anything. Probably because it didn't fit nicely in their godawful "ribbon" concept for the interface.)Now, you might be saying "Well, of course Excel isn't appropriate for scientific data analysis. That's not entirely a bad thing, but it does make for some additional headaches.(And, of course, the Data Analysis ToolPak was entirely too useful, and thus has been removed from the new version of Excel. This brings uncertainty propagation back into play, pedagogically, though it forces some contortions in order to get the data into the right form to show a linear relationship. Fan-tastic.Happily, the lack of the analysis tools probably renders this all a moot point, starting next year when ITS upgrades the computers in the teaching labs. That's right, it defaults to no axis labels at all. The data points have become cartoonishly large, but that's a relatively minor problem.If you're perceptive, though, you'll notice something missing. And at least one of the axes is moved out of the middle of the goddamn plot, making it halfway readable. The dreadful grey background is gone, and the colors, while still weirdly muted, at least have a reasonable contrast with the background. But just for fun, here's what you get from the new version:I'll admit, there are a few improvements. ![]() How does Joe Average User know to look for it there, as opposed to the hundreds of other submenus in Excel? Oh, and don't tell me to go looking under "Help". Sure, I'm sure it's easy in the sense that you can possibly find everything you need in a GUI menu somewhere, but I've found that the extra effort I invested in learning LaTeX on my own has paid off in spades over the long run.Full Disclosure: I think Microsoft is generally awful and try my best to avoid coming into contact with any of their products.As for how doth Excel suck, as others have pointed out it's reasonably powerful, just user-unfriendly - you clearly haven't invested much time into learning it or you'd have known about default graph styles and so on.And pray tell me, how am I supposed to RTFM when Microsoft (who are hardly the only or even worst offenders in this regard) does not provide TFM? Yes, the capability is there, buried in some obscure submenu.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorChris ArchivesCategories |